United States v. Spencer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7811

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT LEE SPENCER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-171)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Spencer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Agnes Hickey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition for a writ of mandamus for production and copy of

transcripts and the master file in his criminal case. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

abuse of discretion. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED