United States v. Spellman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2010·No. 09-7828·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7828

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LORENZO OWEN SPELLMAN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00107-HEH-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 4, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Owen Spellman, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea- Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Owen Spellman appeals the district court’s

order denying his post-judgment motion to withdraw his guilty

plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Spellman, No. 3:08-cr-00107-HEH-1 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Spellman, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Spellman (United States v. Spellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.