United States v. Specialist MICHAEL A. PRINCE

Opinion

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Before CONN, HOFFMAN, and GIFFORD Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Specialist MICHAEL A. PRINCE United States Army, Appellee

ARMY MISC 20100939

1st Cavalry Division James L. Varley, Military Judge Colonel Mark Sydenham, Staff Judge Advocate

For Appellee: Colonel Mark Tellitocci, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Imogene M. Jamison, JA; Major Laura R. Kesler, JA; Captain Matthew T. Grady, JA (on brief).

For Appellant: Colonel Michael E. Mulligan, JA; Major Adam S. Kazin, JA; Captain Joshua W. Johnson, JA (on brief); Colonel Michael E. Mulligan, JA; Major Amber J. Williams, JA; Major Adam S. Kazin, JA; Captain Joshua W. Johnson, JA (on motion for reconsideration).

26 January 2011

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per Curiam:

On reconsideration, applying the standard of review articulated in United States v. Thompson, 63 M.J. 228, 230 (C.A.A.F. 2006), we do not find that the military judge was wrong as a matter of law. Accordingly, the appeal by the United States under Article 62, UCMJ, of the military judge’s ruling is denied.

FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. Clerk of Court