United States v. Spangle
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Lyle Spangle appeals from his 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Spangle’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Spangle filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
54 F. App'x 653 (United States v. Spangle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.