United States v. Southland Management

326 F.3d 669
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Southland Management. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 F.3d 669
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 24, 2002·No. 00-60267·Published

Opinion

307 F.3d 352

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHLAND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; et al., Defendants,
W. Thad McLaurin; Charles C. Taylor, Jr.; Arthur W. Doty, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-60267.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 23, 2002.

John S. Koppel (argued), Douglas N. Letter, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div.-App. Staff, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Alan W. Perry (argued), Roland M. Slover, Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz & Tardy, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees.

William Bradley Tully, John Robert Hellow, Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, Los Angeles, CA, for Federation of American Hospitals, Amicus Curiae.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Tom S. Lee, Chief Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 11, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002, 288 F.3d 665)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Southland Management, 326 F.3d 669 (5th Cir. 2002).

326 F.3d 669 (United States v. Southland Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related