United States v. Soto-Rodriguez
This text of 177 F. App'x 557 (United States v. Soto-Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gaspar Soto-Rodriguez appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed after he pled guilty to unlawful re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Soto-Rodriguez contends that the district court erred in finding that his conviction under California Vehicle Code § 10851 qualified as an aggravated felony enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), because the California statute allows convictions based on aiding and abetting liability. Soto-Rodriguez’s contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Vidal, 426 F.3d 1011, 1015-17 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [558]*558courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-soto-rodriguez-ca9-2006.