United States v. Soto
This text of 74 M.J. 350 (United States v. Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 38422. On consideration of the certifícate for review (74 M.J. 180 (C.A.A.F.2014)), and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding Appellee’s rape conviction, and any lesser offense, factually insufficient. Accordingly, it is ordered that the certified questions are answered in the negative and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 M.J. 350, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-soto-armfor-2015.