United States v. Soto

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Soto

74 M.J. 350, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 398

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 2, 2015·No. No. 15-0247/AF·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CCA 38422. On consideration of the certifícate for review (74 M.J. 180 (C.A.A.F.2014)), and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding Appellee’s rape conviction, and any lesser offense, factually insufficient. Accordingly, it is ordered that the certified questions are answered in the negative and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 38422. On consideration of the certifícate for review (74 M.J. 180 (C.A.A.F.2014)), and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding Appellee’s rape conviction, and any lesser offense, factually insufficient. Accordingly, it is ordered that the certified questions are answered in the negative and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

United States v. Soto, 74 M.J. 350, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 398 (Ark. 2015).

Pincite

74 M.J. 350 (United States v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related