United States v. Sotelo-Camacho
This text of 217 F. App'x 872 (United States v. Sotelo-Camacho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sotelo-Camacho’s conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 F. App'x 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sotelo-camacho-ca11-2007.