United States v. Sophon Potisophon and Somchin Potisophon

798 F.2d 1416, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 18387
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 31, 1986·No. 19-305·Unpublished

Opinion

798 F.2d 1416

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sophon POTISOPHON and Somchin POTISOPHON, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 85-6055.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 31, 1986.

Before MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judes and DEMASCIO, District Court Judge.*

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable Robert E. DeMascio, U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sophon Potisophon and Somchin Potisophon, 798 F.2d 1416, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 18387 (6th Cir. 1986).

798 F.2d 1416 (United States v. Sophon Potisophon and Somchin Potisophon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romines v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
798 F.2d 1416 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)