United States v. Sophon Potisophon and Somchin Potisophon
This text of 798 F.2d 1416 (United States v. Sophon Potisophon and Somchin Potisophon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sophon POTISOPHON and Somchin POTISOPHON, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 85-6055.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 31, 1986.
Before MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judes and DEMASCIO, District Court Judge.*
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable Robert E. DeMascio, U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 F.2d 1416, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 18387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sophon-potisophon-and-somchin-poti-ca6-1986.