United States v. Sonni Hernandez
This text of 155 F. App'x 252 (United States v. Sonni Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Sonni Natasha Hernandez appeals the 120-month sentence the district court * imposed after Hernandez pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy charge. Hernandez argues the government acted in bad faith by not filing a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) for a departure below the mandatory minimum sentence. We conclude Hernandez failed to make a substantial threshold showing that the government’s refusal was “irrational, in bad faith, or based on an unconstitutional motive.” See United States v. Davis, 397 F.3d 672, 676 (8th Cir.2005) (quoting Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181, 186, 112 S.Ct. 1840, 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992)). Accordingly, we affirm.
The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. App'x 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sonni-hernandez-ca8-2005.