United States v. Solomon
70 F.2d 834, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328
Opinion
• Motion for leave to proceed on this appeal in forma pauperis.
The defendant pleaded guilty and now appeals from a sentence of two years on count 1 and three years on the other counts of the indictment, the latter to run consecutively with the sentence on count 1. His sole point urged on the appeal is that 18 USCA § 709a, effective June 29, 1932, precludes consecutive sentences. We do not construe this section of the United States Code Annotated as forbidding consecutive sentences.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Solomon, 70 F.2d 834, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328 (2d Cir. 1934).
70 F.2d 834 (United States v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
974 F.2d 1279 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Jules W. Wertheimer
434 F.2d 1004 (Second Circuit, 1970)
Knight v. United States
185 F. Supp. 397 (W.D. Kentucky, 1960)
Richard Willard Kay v. United States
279 F.2d 734 (Sixth Circuit, 1960)
Harry Morris Sherman v. United States
241 F.2d 329 (Ninth Circuit, 1957)
Gus La Vern Hiller v. United States
218 F.2d 641 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
Bracey v. Hill
11 F. Supp. 148 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)