United States v. Solomon

Second Circuit

United States v. Solomon

70 F.2d 834, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1934

DocketNo. 204

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 70 F.2d 834 (United States v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Solomon, 70 F.2d 834, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328 (2d Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

• Motion for leave to proceed on this appeal in forma pauperis.

The defendant pleaded guilty and now appeals from a sentence of two years on count 1 and three years on the other counts of the indictment, the latter to run consecutively with the sentence on count 1. His sole point urged on the appeal is that 18 USCA § 709a, effective June 29, 1932, precludes consecutive sentences. We do not construe this section of the United States Code Annotated as forbidding consecutive sentences.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

• Motion for leave to proceed on this appeal in forma pauperis.

The defendant pleaded guilty and now appeals from a sentence of two years on count 1 and three years on the other counts of the indictment, the latter to run consecutively with the sentence on count 1. His sole point urged on the appeal is that 18 USCA § 709a, effective June 29, 1932, precludes consecutive sentences. We do not construe this section of the United States Code Annotated as forbidding consecutive sentences.

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 F.2d 834, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-solomon-ca2-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack