United States v. Solis
This text of 325 F. App'x 620 (United States v. Solis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joel Solis appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Solis contends that the district court failed to adequately explain its sentence and erred by using a prior sentence as an arbitrary limit on the extent of a variance instead of considering all the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We conclude that the district court properly considered the § 3553(a) factors, provided an adequate explanation of the reasons for the sentence, and imposed a sentence that was not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F. App'x 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-solis-ca9-2009.