United States v. Soleye
This text of 19 F. App'x 539 (United States v. Soleye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Tunbosen Soleye appeals his 18-month sentence following his conviction pursuant to his guilty plea to defrauding the government with respect to claims in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287. His attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she can identify no issues for review.
Our examination of counsel’s brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates there are no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the sentence is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. App'x 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-soleye-ca9-2001.