United States v. Sol C. Schwartz, Abe Chapman, and Frank C. Marolda

853 F.2d 768
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 31, 1988·No. 88-1252·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

853 F.2d 768

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sol C. SCHWARTZ, Abe Chapman, and Frank C. Marolda,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-1252.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1988.
Decided Aug. 12, 1988.
As Amended Aug. 31, 1988.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; William H. Orrick, Jr., Presiding.

Prior reports: 679 F.Supp. 972; 785 F.2d 673.

Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and HUPP, District Judge.*

The order of the district court is reversed, and the stay heretofore ordered by this court is vacated. The mandate will issue at once. See United States v. Gatto, 763 F.2d 1040 (9th Cir.1985).

An opinion will follow.

*

The Honorable Harry L. Hupp, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sol C. Schwartz, Abe Chapman, and Frank C. Marolda, 853 F.2d 768 (9th Cir. 1988).

853 F.2d 768 (United States v. Sol C. Schwartz, Abe Chapman, and Frank C. Marolda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horsley v. Burton
2010 Ohio 6315 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)