United States v. Sobitan, Babajide
This text of 138 F. App'x 846 (United States v. Sobitan, Babajide) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Babajide Sobitan was convicted of attempting to reenter the United States without authorization after having been deported, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and was sentenced to 97 months’ imprisonment. He argues under United States v. Booker, —U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), that the district court improperly treated the sentencing guidelines as mandatory and impermissibly increased his offense level based on facts found only by a preponderance of the evidence. Sobitan preserved these arguments by objecting at sentencing, and thus our review is plenary. United States v. Schlifer, 403 F.3d 849, 854 (7th Cir.2005); United States v. Hollis, 230 F.3d 955, 958-59 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Paz, 405 F.3d 946, 948-49 (11th Cir.2005). Thus we must vacate Sobitan’s sentence unless the government can establish that the error was harmless, Schlifer, 403 F.3d at 854, a burden that the government concedes it cannot meet here. Accordingly, we VACATE Sobitan’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing in light of Booker. See id.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 F. App'x 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sobitan-babajide-ca7-2005.