United States v. Snipe

258 F. App'x 554
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2007·No. 07-7210·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to compel the Government to file a substantial assistance motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Snipe, No. 2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1 (D.S.C. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Snipe, 258 F. App'x 554 (4th Cir. 2007).

258 F. App'x 554 (United States v. Snipe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.