United States v. Snellenberger
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-50169 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00064-AHS MICHAEL LEE SNELLENBERGER, aka Central District Michael Lee Cutter, Michael Lee of California, Davidson, Robert Eugene Frehly, Santa Ana Cutter Snellenberger, “Cutter”, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2655 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Snellenberger (United States v. Snellenberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.