United States v. Snellenberger

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Snellenberger. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 F.3d 699
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2008·No. 06-50169·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-50169 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00064-AHS MICHAEL LEE SNELLENBERGER, aka  Central District Michael Lee Cutter, Michael Lee of California, Davidson, Robert Eugene Frehly, Santa Ana Cutter Snellenberger, “Cutter”, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed March 14, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

2655 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Snellenberger, (9th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Snellenberger (United States v. Snellenberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.