United States v. SMITH
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and THORNHILL Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Tamere A. SMITH Midshipman, U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202400031
Decided: 14 February 2025
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges: Derek Butler (arraignment) John J. Stephens (motions) Andrew L. Braden (trial)
Sentence adjudged 17 October 2023 by a general court-martial tried at the Washington Navy Yard, Washington D.C., consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 70 months and a dismissal.
For Appellant: Major Colin W. Hotard, USMC United States v. Smith, NMCCA No. 202400031 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. SMITH (United States v. SMITH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.