United States v. Smith
Opinion
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
The above captioned case is re-submitted.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Helen Smith has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Smith did not file a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
142 F. App'x 283 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.