United States v. Smith
This text of United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-10704 Document: 00516629800 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 22-10704 January 31, 2023 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
William Lamar Smith,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-12-1 ______________________________
Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent William Lamar Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Smith has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10704 Document: 00516629800 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/31/2023
No. 22-10704
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smith-ca5-2023.