United States v. Smith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 F.3d 518
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2003·No. 02-30466·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30466 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JESSE JAMES SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-339-1-J -------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesse James Smith entered a conditional guilty plea

to possession with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride.

He seeks, as his sole issue on appeal, to have this court

re-examine its prior determination on interlocutory appeal in

United States v. Smith, 273 F.3d 629 (5th Cir. 2001), that there

was reasonable suspicion to support the search of his cruise-ship

cabin. Review of this issue is precluded under the law-of-the-

case doctrine, and we will not reexamine it. See United States

v. Becerra, 155 F.3d 740, 752-53 (5th Cir. 1998).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30466 -2-

This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Becerra
155 F.3d 740 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Howard v. King
707 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Jesse James Smith Keisha L. Smith
273 F.3d 629 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)