United States v. Smith

60 F. App'x 980
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2003·No. 03-6220·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his “Verified Emergency Petition to Arrest Judgment for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. CR-01-7 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 13, 2003). We deny Smith’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, 60 F. App'x 980 (4th Cir. 2003).

60 F. App'x 980 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.