United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 1998·No. 98-7022·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FERNANDO M. SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-499-AW, CA-97-2089-AW)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 27, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fernando M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Fernando M. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998), his motion for reconsideration, and his motion for an

evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-95-

499-AW; CA-97-2089-AW (D. Md. Apr. 20, 1998, Nov. 5, 1997, & Oct.

20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related