United States v. Smith
This text of United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7189
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CURTIS LAMAR SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-200-S, CA-96-131-4)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Lamar Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Anti- terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR- 91-200-S; CA-96-131-4 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 1996). We deny as moot
Appellant's motion to hold the case in abeyance for United States
v. Stroman, No. 96-6054 (4th Cir., July 30, 1996) (unpublished). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smith-ca4-1997.