United States v. Smith

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Smith

687 F. App'x 883

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 5, 2017·No. No. 15-15662 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David McCrea, appointed counsel for Kalvin Smith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Kalvin Smith’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David McCrea, appointed counsel for Kalvin Smith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Kalvin Smith’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED as moot.

United States v. Smith, 687 F. App'x 883 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

687 F. App'x 883 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related