United States v. Smith

433 F. App'x 796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 568 F.3d 923
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 7, 2011·No. No. 10-14876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brett L. Wadsworth, appointed appellate counsel for John William Smith, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, 433 F. App'x 796 (11th Cir. 2011).

433 F. App'x 796 (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)