United States v. Smith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 F.3d 1121
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 5, 1996·No. 95-8120·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 95-8120.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Harry Leon SMITH, III, Defendant-Appellant.

April 24, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:94-CR-149); Richard C. Freeman, Judge.

(Opinion December 5, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996, 106 F.3d 350).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should

be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service

having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous

panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

* Senior U.S. Circuit Judge James C. Hill may participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Smith, (11th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Smith (United States v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Harry Leon Smith, III
106 F.3d 350 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)