United States v. Smelser
70 M.J. 412, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 972
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedNovember 8, 2011
DocketNo. 12-0046/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 70 M.J. 412 (United States v. Smelser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Smelser, 70 M.J. 412, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 972 (Ark. 2011).
Opinions
CCA 20110114. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE AS IT DOES NOT ALLEGE EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Fosler
70 M.J. 225 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 M.J. 412, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-smelser-armfor-2011.