United States v. Slanina

313 F.3d 891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24271, 2002 WL 31680795
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Slanina. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 F.3d 670
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2002·No. 00-20926·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

*892 BY THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion for summary remand is GRANTED. We view the Supreme Court order of remand to this court as vacating the judgment of this court, not the judgment and conviction of the district court. We remand to the district court, as suggested by both parties, so that the district court may decide in the first instance the impact of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234, 122 S.Ct. 1389, 152 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002), on the judgment of conviction and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Slanina, 313 F.3d 891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24271, 2002 WL 31680795 (5th Cir. 2002).

313 F.3d 891 (United States v. Slanina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
535 U.S. 234 (Supreme Court, 2002)