United States v. Slagle

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Slagle

655 F. App'x 971

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2016·No. No. 16-6319·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robin A. Slagle appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely her third-party objection to forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fisher, No. 3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1, 2016 WL 226679 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robin A. Slagle appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely her third-party objection to forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fisher, No. 3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1, 2016 WL 226679 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Slagle, 655 F. App'x 971 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

655 F. App'x 971 (United States v. Slagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related