United States v. Slagle
This text of 655 F. App'x 971 (United States v. Slagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Robin A. Slagle appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely her third-party objection to forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fisher, No. 3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1, 2016 WL 226679 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 F. App'x 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-slagle-ca4-2016.