United States v. Skyler Christopher Sanders
Opinion
Case: 18-12560 Date Filed: 03/20/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-12560
Non-Argument Calendar
D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00227-JDW-JSS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SKYLER CHRISTOPHER SANDERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
(March 20, 2019)
Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Skyler Sanders’s plea agreement is GRANTED. As Sanders acknowledges in his initial brief, this Court has repeatedly upheld the
Case: 18-12560 Date Filed: 03/20/2019 Page: 2 of 2
constitutionality of appeal waivers in valid plea agreements. United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1295 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Howle, 166 F.3d 1166, 1169 (11th Cir. 1999). Here, Sanders’s appeal waiver is plainly enforceable. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Buchanan, 131 F.3d 1005, 1008 (11th Cir. 1997) (“[W]here it is clear from the plea agreement and the [plea] colloquy . . . that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into a sentence appeal waiver, that waiver should be enforced without requiring the government to brief the merits of the appeal.”).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Skyler Christopher Sanders (United States v. Skyler Christopher Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.