United States v. Sky Little Coyote

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 2018
Docket17-30181
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Sky Little Coyote (United States v. Sky Little Coyote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sky Little Coyote, (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 13 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30181

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00015-SPW

v. MEMORANDUM* SKY MIGUEL LITTLE COYOTE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Sky Miguel Little Coyote appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 10-month sentence imposed upon his fourth revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Little Coyote contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). because, in light of his severe emotional problems, imposition of a custodial term

will not ensure the protection of the public, deter him, or result in his rehabilitation.

The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007). The high-end sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the

18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Little Coyote’s repeated violations of supervised release. See Gall, 552

U.S. at 51; United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir. 2007) (at a

revocation sentencing, violator may be sanctioned for breaching the court’s trust).

AFFIRMED.

2 17-30181

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Sky Little Coyote, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sky-little-coyote-ca9-2018.