United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk

139 F. 1008, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10
District Court, N.D. California·Decided June 30, 1904·No. No. 1,634·Published

Opinion

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion this day filed in the case of United States v.,Wm. H. Harts, 131 Fed. 886. For , the reasons therein stated, and also because, upon consideration of the evidence, I find that the allegations of the libel are true, judgment will be entered in favor of the government for a forfeiture of the goods described in the libel of information as prayed for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk, 139 F. 1008, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (N.D. Cal. 1904).

139 F. 1008 (United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Harts
131 F. 886 (N.D. California, 1904)