United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk

N.D. California

United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk

139 F. 1008, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California

DecidedJune 30, 1904

DocketNo. 1,634

StatusPublished

This text of 139 F. 1008 (United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sixteen Bolts of Silk, 139 F. 1008, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (N.D. Cal. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion this day filed in the case of United States v.,Wm. H. Harts, 131 Fed. 886. For , the reasons therein stated, and also because, upon consideration of the evidence, I find that the allegations of the libel are true, judgment will be entered in favor of the government for a forfeiture of the goods described in the libel of information as prayed for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion this day filed in the case of United States v.,Wm. H. Harts, 131 Fed. 886. For , the reasons therein stated, and also because, upon consideration of the evidence, I find that the allegations of the libel are true, judgment will be entered in favor of the government for a forfeiture of the goods described in the libel of information as prayed for.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 F. 1008, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sixteen-bolts-of-silk-cand-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack