United States v. Six Lots, Hatch

Supreme Court

United States v. Six Lots, Hatch

154 U.S. 596, 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1418

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 4, 1874

DocketNo. 255. No. 283

StatusPublished

This text of 154 U.S. 596 (United States v. Six Lots, Hatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Six Lots, Hatch, 154 U.S. 596, 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1418 (1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Strong

delivered the opinion of the court.

These eases are in all essential particulars like the case of The United States v. Eight Hundred and Forty-four Lots and Ten Squares, of Ground, the property of John Slidell; The Confiscation Cases, 20 Wall. 92. What we have said in reference to that ease is equally applicable to these,

Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Thomas J. Durant for plaintiff in error. Mr. O. M. Conrad and Mr. C. Cushing for defendants in error.

In each case the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to affirm the judgment or decree of the District Court. Reversed.

Clirrord, Davis and Field, JJ., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI