United States v. Singh
This text of 154 F. App'x 609 (United States v. Singh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Harpal Singh, aka Gary Sukhwal, appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to attempted kidnapping while impersonating a federal law enforcement [610]*610officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1), (a)(3), (d). Singh, who was sentenced under the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines before the Supreme Court its issued its decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), asserts that the case should be remanded for resentencing under the post-Booker advisory Guidelines.
We dismiss the appeal because Singh, in his plea agreement, knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Cortez-Arias, 403 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir.2005), as amended, 425 F.3d 547 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that pre-Booker waiver of right to appeal precludes appellate relief under Booker).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-singh-ca9-2005.