United States v. Sindram

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sindram

164 F. App'x 459

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2006·No. No. 05-7269, 05-7336, 05-7478·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael J. Sindram appeals district court orders denying his motions for modification and clarification, reconsideration and for appropriate relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sindram, No. CR-96-111 (D. Md. Aug. 1, 2005; filed Aug. 12, 2005, entered Aug. 15, 2005; filed Sept. 6, 2005, entered Sept. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael J. Sindram appeals district court orders denying his motions for modification and clarification, reconsideration and for appropriate relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sindram, No. CR-96-111 (D. Md. Aug. 1, 2005; filed Aug. 12, 2005, entered Aug. 15, 2005; filed Sept. 6, 2005, entered Sept. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Sindram, 164 F. App'x 459 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 459 (United States v. Sindram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.