United States v. Sinclair

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Sinclair

209 F. 612, 126 C.C.A. 606, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1830

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1913

DocketNo. 2,504

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F. 612 (United States v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sinclair, 209 F. 612, 126 C.C.A. 606, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1830 (5th Cir. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived. The cause was tried by the court, which made a special finding of facts. The question raised in this writ is whether the facts as found warrant the judgment rendered.

We do not decide whether or not the homestead of Sinclair was exempt from distraint, the decision of that question being unnecessary, because we conclude • that the fact that the sale was not advertised in a weekly newspaper published in tjhe county for 20 days made the sale void.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived. The cause was tried by the court, which made a special finding of facts. The question raised in this writ is whether the facts as found warrant the judgment rendered.

We do not decide whether or not the homestead of Sinclair was exempt from distraint, the decision of that question being unnecessary, because we conclude • that the fact that the sale was not advertised in a weekly newspaper published in tjhe county for 20 days made the sale void.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F. 612, 126 C.C.A. 606, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sinclair-ca5-1913.