United States v. Simpson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Simpson. Read the opinion of the Court — 334 F.3d 453
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2000·No. 00-10251·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10251 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY SIMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-268-1-Y - - - - - - - - - - August 24, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jeffrey Simpson, the federal

public defender (FPD), has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel

and brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Simpson has not filed a response. Our independent

review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Simpson, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Simpson (United States v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)