United States v. Simpson

426 F.2d 286, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9304
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 11, 1970·No. No. 14051·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

When defendant registered with his local board he claimed to be a conscientious objector opposed to participation in war in any form and opposed to noncombatant training and service in the Armed Forces. The board first gave him a student deferment; and when he ceased to be a student, the board classified him I-A-O. Defendant appealed his I-A-0 classification, urging that he should have been classified I-O. His claim was rejected and he was ordered to report for induction and assignment to noncombatant duty. Neither in notices to him nor in the board’s minutes was any reason stated why defendant’s claim to be classified 1-0 was denied.

Defendant’s selective service file established a prima facie case of entitlement to a 1-0 classification. It follows that the failure to assign any reason for its rejection renders invalid the conviction for failure to report for induction based upon the invalid classification. United States v. Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4 Cir. 1970); United States v. James, 417 F.2d 826 (4 Cir. 1969). Defendant was entitled to acquittal.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Simpson, 426 F.2d 286, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9304 (4th Cir. 1970).

426 F.2d 286 (United States v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ray Nevin Stetter, Jr.
445 F.2d 472 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Tippo v. Commanding Officer
326 F. Supp. 205 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
United States v. Peter Kenly Crownfield
439 F.2d 839 (Third Circuit, 1971)