United States v. Simon Alex Hernandez
This text of 434 F.2d 1316 (United States v. Simon Alex Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We find the evidence sufficient on both counts.
On appeal, for the first time an objection is raised in behalf of Hernandez as to a search of his automobile after his arrest. This search did produce additional evidence. The objection, if it had merit, was waived below.
The renewed motion for bail is denied.
The motion to correct the probation report is denied. The appellant may now make a proper motion in the district court under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and under such a motion the alleged inaccuracy of the probation report may be considered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 F.2d 1316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-simon-alex-hernandez-ca9-1970.