United States v. Silverstein

Second Circuit

United States v. Silverstein

344 F.2d 1016

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 1965

DocketNo. 470, Docket 29538

StatusPublished

This text of 344 F.2d 1016 (United States v. Silverstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Silverstein, 344 F.2d 1016 (2d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which directed Harry G. Silver-stein to comply with an Internal Revenue summons and to produce the book and records of two real estate syndicates, Model City B Associates and Model City C Associates. We agree with the reasons stated by Judge Bryan in his opinion, reported at 237 F.Supp. 446 (1965). As Judge Bryan pointed out, the real estate syndicates here involved are very similar to the real estate syndicates involved in the earlier case of United States v. Silverstein, 210 F.Supp. 401 (1962), aff’d by us, 314 F.2d 789, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 807, 83 S.Ct. 1696, 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963), where Judge Tyler directed this same respondent to produce the records of those syndicates.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which directed Harry G. Silver-stein to comply with an Internal Revenue summons and to produce the book and records of two real estate syndicates, Model City B Associates and Model City C Associates. We agree with the reasons stated by Judge Bryan in his opinion, reported at 237 F.Supp. 446 (1965). As Judge Bryan pointed out, the real estate syndicates here involved are very similar to the real estate syndicates involved in the earlier case of United States v. Silverstein, 210 F.Supp. 401 (1962), aff’d by us, 314 F.2d 789, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 807, 83 S.Ct. 1696, 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963), where Judge Tyler directed this same respondent to produce the records of those syndicates.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 F.2d 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-silverstein-ca2-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack