United States v. Silver
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
A general court-martial convened in South Vietnam convicted the accused of destroying a Government tent through neglect,1 and of wrongfully making a known false statement under oath, in violation of Articles 108 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 908 and 933, respectively. It sentenced him to be dismissed from the service. On review, a board of review set aside the latter offense, and reduced the sentence to a reprimand and forfeiture of $250.00 per month for six months.
Between the time of the board of review’s decision and the accused’s petition for grant of review, this Court decided United States v Robbins, 16 USCMA 474, 475, 37 CMR 94. We held it is error to instruct a court-martial that if it believes a witness has testified falsely to a material fact it can “ ‘disregard his testimony in whole or in part, except insofar as it may have been corroborated by other credible evidence.’ ” Substantially, the same instruction was given in this case. Reversal is, therefore, required.
The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
16 C.M.A. 611 (United States v. Silver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.