United States v. Sills

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2010·No. 10-6345·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6345

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EDWARD SILLS, a/k/a Bobby,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Edward Sills, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Edward Sills appeals a district court order

denying his “Motion Petition the Court to Alter or Amend

Judgment Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 59(e).” We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Sills, No.

2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sills, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Sills (United States v. Sills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.