United States v. Sills
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EDWARD SILLS, a/k/a Bobby,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Edward Sills, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert Edward Sills appeals a district court order
denying his “Motion Petition the Court to Alter or Amend
Judgment Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 59(e).” We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Sills, No.
2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sills (United States v. Sills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.