United States v. Sills

234 F. App'x 143

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant Matthew M. Sills appeals the district court’s order entering judgment against defendant currency in this forfeiture proceeding under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sills, No. 5:05-cv-00418-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.