United States v. Sigifredo Ramirez
This text of 206 F. App'x 622 (United States v. Sigifredo Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sigifredo Ramirez appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Ramirez argues the sentence is unreasonable, contending that the court — after granting a safety-valve reduction — gave “no clear reason” for sentencing him at the midpoint rather than the bottom of the Guidelines imprisonment range.
The record reflects that the district court considered appropriate sentencing factors, and we conclude the sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Long Soldier, 431 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Tobacco, 428 F.3d 1148, 1151 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Lincoln, 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 840, 163 L.Ed.2d 715 (2005).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 F. App'x 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sigifredo-ramirez-ca8-2006.