United States v. Sigfriedo Garcia-Lopez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 21, 2017
Docket16-40742
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Sigfriedo Garcia-Lopez (United States v. Sigfriedo Garcia-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sigfriedo Garcia-Lopez, (5th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Case: 16-40742 Document: 00513882572 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40742 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED February 21, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SIGFRIEDO GARCIA-LOPEZ, also known as Chavelo, also known as Chave, also known as Ismael Garcia-Lopez, also known as Lopez Garcia, also known as Francisco Cruz-Zavalla, also known as Eugenio Arcadia-Silva,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16-CR-56-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sigfriedo Garcia- Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-40742 Document: 00513882572 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 16-40742

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Sigfriedo Garcia-Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sigfriedo-garcia-lopez-ca5-2017.