United States v. Sigala-Mariscal
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Rene Sigala-Mariscal appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
[780]*780Sigala-Mariscal contends that the district court erred by failing to consider the disparity between his sentence and sentences imposed upon unlawful reentry defendants in districts with fast-track sentencing programs. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
228 F. App'x 779 (United States v. Sigala-Mariscal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.