United States v. Sierra-Ledesma
This text of United States v. Sierra-Ledesma (United States v. Sierra-Ledesma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
PUBLISH June 2, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nos. 10-3066 & 10-3067 EUSEBIO SIERRA-LEDESMA,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (D.C. Nos. 6:97-CR-10124-MLB-1 & 6:09-CR-10104-MLB-1)
Timothy J. Henry, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Wichita, Kansas, for Defendant-Appellant.
Brent I. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney (Barry R. Grissom, United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Wichita, Kansas, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before KELLY, BALDOCK, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Defendant Eusebio Sierra-Ledesma of the crime of having
been found in the United States, without the express consent of the Attorney General,
after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Defendant appeals,
claiming (1) the district court improperly failed to instruct the jury as to the mens rea
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Sierra-Ledesma, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sierra-ledesma-ca10-2011.