United States v. Sidney Steinschreiber, Doing Business as Sidcaps Laboratories, John P. Calise, Westchester Blood Service, Inc.

326 F.2d 759
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 1964
Docket28498_1
StatusPublished

This text of 326 F.2d 759 (United States v. Sidney Steinschreiber, Doing Business as Sidcaps Laboratories, John P. Calise, Westchester Blood Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sidney Steinschreiber, Doing Business as Sidcaps Laboratories, John P. Calise, Westchester Blood Service, Inc., 326 F.2d 759 (2d Cir. 1964).

Opinion

326 F.2d 759

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sidney STEINSCHREIBER, doing business as Sidcaps Laboratories, John P. Calise, Westchester Blood Service, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 245.

Docket 28498.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued January 9, 1964.

Decided January 17, 1964.

Certiorari Denied March 30, 1964.

See 84 S.Ct. 1125.

Appeal from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Harold R. Tyler, Jr., J., sitting without a jury.

Affirmed.

Albert J. Gaynor, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, Richard A. Givens, Charles A. Stillman and Robert J. Geniesse, Asst. U. S. Attys., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Abraham S. Robinson, New York City (Emanuel Thebner and Herbert Alan Johnson, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant Sidney Steinschreiber.

Alexander Dreiband, New York City (Dreiband, Bleecker & Silberman, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants John P. Calise and West-chester Blood Service, Inc.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgments below are affirmed on the opinion of Judge Tyler, reported at D.C., 219 F.Supp. 373 (S.D.N.Y.1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Steinschreiber
219 F. Supp. 373 (S.D. New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 F.2d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sidney-steinschreiber-doing-business-as-sidcaps-ca2-1964.