United States v. Sidney Carl Frazier
This text of 324 F.3d 1224 (United States v. Sidney Carl Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
324 F.3d 1224
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sidney Carl FRAZIER, a.k.a. Sydney Oliver, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-12880.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 12, 2003.
Craig L. Crawford, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Pamela A. Moine, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pensacola, FL, Francis Todd Williams, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida (No. 00-00024-CR-SPM-1); Stephan P. Mickle, Judge.
Before WILSON, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
Appellant's motion to vacate the opinion issued in this appeal and to dismiss this appeal as moot in light of the completion of his sentence is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F.3d 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sidney-carl-frazier-ca11-2003.